Behaviour is changing in our schools.
More and more educators I work with are saying the same thing:
“The needs of our children feel different now.”
And they are right.
But it’s not just children who are changing.
Our world is changing — rapidly.
And if both are true, then our education system, our curriculum and our expectations must evolve too.
We cannot keep responding to today’s children — who are growing up in an entirely different world — with yesterday’s models of education.
That doesn’t mean lowering standards.
It means reimagining what those standards are for.
For generations, education prepared children for a relatively predictable future:
stable career ladders
linear pathways
repetition and compliance
success defined by sitting still, listening quietly and producing the “right” answer
But that world no longer exists.
Many of the jobs our children will do:
haven’t been invented yet
won’t follow a traditional career ladder
will value creativity, adaptability and emotional intelligence
will require collaboration, problem-solving and resilience
Traditional definitions of success — grades, speed, compliance — are no longer reliable indicators of future wellbeing or fulfilment.
And yet, in many settings, we are still:
rolling out the same approaches
repeating the same structures
expecting children to fit into systems that were designed for a very different time
In response to a fast-changing world, our instinct is often to do more:
more formal learning earlier
more evidence
more pressure
more “school readiness”
But what if the opposite is needed?
What if, instead of accelerating childhood, we slow it right down?
Slowing down doesn’t mean doing less.
It means doing what matters more intentionally.
It means:
prioritising deep thinking over surface-level outcomes
valuing creativity over compliance
nurturing emotional intelligence alongside cognition
giving children time to explore, question, fail and try again
This is where slow pedagogy becomes not outdated — but essential.
Children today are growing up in a world that is:
louder
faster
more stimulating
less predictable
Their nervous systems are processing far more than previous generations ever had to.
So when behaviour shifts, it is not surprising.
Before we ask “What’s wrong with the child?”
we must ask “What is the environment asking of them?”
Many settings are quietly wrestling with this question:
How appropriate is whole-class carpet time — and the expectations we place on children during it?
Is it realistic to expect:
30 children to sit still
to listen passively
to regulate their bodies
to override sensory needs
to process language-heavy input
…all at the same time?
For some children, this is manageable.
For many others, it is overwhelming.
And when their nervous systems can’t cope, we often see:
fidgeting
calling out
rolling
disrupting
withdrawing
behaviour labelled as “challenging”
What if this behaviour isn’t defiance —
but communication?
A concern I often hear is:
“Surely there needs to be a balance between regulation and learning how to belong in society?”
Yes.
But belonging is not learned through overwhelm.
Children do not learn how to participate in society by being repeatedly corrected for having developmentally normal needs.
They learn through:
co-regulation
secure relationships
gradual scaffolding
environments that support rather than suppress their bodies
In Scandinavian-inspired early years practice, expectations are not removed — they are introduced slowly.
Children are met where they are, and then gently guided forward.
Regulation is not the opposite of social learning.
It is the foundation of it.
If we want children who can:
think creatively
adapt to change
collaborate with others
manage emotions
find meaning and joy in their work
…then our education system must reflect that reality.
Not by copying and re-rolling outdated models.
But by bravely rethinking what childhood learning is for.
This is not about abandoning structure.
It’s about designing environments, rhythms and expectations that work with children — not against them.
Because when children feel regulated:
behaviour softens
connection deepens
learning becomes meaningful
And when educators feel empowered to adapt practice — not just manage behaviour — education becomes human again.
If this resonates, this philosophy sits at the heart of my heart-led Hygge in the Early Years™ training, where we explore:
behaviour as communication
nervous system awareness
slow pedagogy in a fast world
environments that support both regulation and belonging
🌿 Discover more at www.hyggeintheearlyyears.co.uk
Have you tried my FREE Introduction to Hygge Training yet?